Granny Pam's Genealogical Trials and Triumphs
Header

Task A, security plan for hard copies and photos:

All my collected data relating to my research is scanned, and available in digital format on my “main” computer. My scanned data is in notebooks on shelves, and is not in water proof containers. My irreplaceable original hard copies are stored in our safety deposit box at our credit union. Those are limited to records of a family estate and a hand-written genealogy handed down from an ancestor.

Task B: Secure hard copies and photos in waterproof containers:

I have no plan to store my data in waterproof containers, since I have digital copies of every page, and a total of 3 backup copies of all digital copies. The volume makes it impossible to even dream of waterproof storage.

My limited number of ancestral photographs and keepsakes are stored at home in a fire-proof safe. Digital copies and or photographs reside on my computer. I have not investigated the possibility of waterproof containers for the photos.

Task C: Back up all your data, external, flash, CD, online, or whatever.

Please refer to my data backup plan. This has been in effect for 2+ years and I am satisfied my files and digital photographs are safe. You can enlarge by clicking the thumbnail.

backup plan

If you have questions, please post them in a comment, I will be glad to answer.

Task D: All hard copies and photos scanned and secure them either in a fire-proof safe or offsite in SD box/secure environment. OK, on this one I admit I am confused. Should the hard copies and photos be in a fire-proof safe, and a waterproof container? Task B says waterproof, this one says fire-proof. Help!!!!!! Please comment on this one.

My plan does not change for this. Some irreplaceable photographs are stored in a fire-proof gun safe here at home, but it is not practical to store every document there.

Task E: all data is backed up digitally and secured physically and you can recover form any disaster while only losing one month or less of research.

I am confident about my plan for my digital data. I do not feel I will lose more than a month of data. But I am not waterproof and I cannot tell if the tasks build on each other.

I hope some of my GeneaBlogging friends will comment here and tell me what award I deserve. I am not waterproof, and probably will never be, but my digital copies are safe. The award criteria is:

  • Complete Task A – Bronze Medal
  • Complete Task B – Silver Medal
  • Complete Task C – Gold Medal
  • Complete Task D – Diamond Medal
  • Complete Task E – Platinum Medal

As much as I think I am safe, and deserve at least a diamond medal here, I am open to opinion and suggestions for improvement. What say you?

I just had to get in on this week’s “Better Genealogy” challenge: Play with Google Maps. This is a helpful tool for determining the locations of addresses in your family history. This post is also written to fulfill Item 4A  and item 5F in the GeneaBlogger’s Winter Games.

After her father, David H. Herrington died in 1931, my Mom lived with a variety of adult caretakers. One was Mable Dickenson, and Mom told me a few stories of life in Brooklyn, New York in the late 1930′s and early 1940′s. Mom was very clear on the address: 256 Decatur. Brooklyn. Kings County. Here is one of only two photos I have of my mother as a child, it shows her with a young man I know nothing about, but who also lived with Miss Dickenson.

Marge Herrington

I took the challenge and did a search on Google Maps for 256 Decatur, Brooklyn, NY. Lucky me, I got a result.
View Larger Map

There is not a lot about that map that helps me, so I switched to Satellite view, and moved way in close. Hmm. Those houses do look like the brownstones Mom described, stuck together in a row.

sat view

I noticed that there was a street view of this particular area, so I switched to that. To use the street view, you grab the little orange man from the directional and distance tool on the left side of the screen. Pick him up by holding your mouse down and drag him to the location you wish to see and drop him down.

street view

After I dropped him, I saw this (click to enlarge any of  my thumbnails):

256approx

The box in the upper left says, “256 Decatur Street, New York, NY, United States,” and “address is approximate”.  Interesting information, approximate. The directional arrows allowed me to scroll the street view, so I “walked up and down the street a few houses each way.

Two houses to the left of the large light colored one, I saw something of interest on the whit house.  You can see it in the far left of the photo above, and more clearly below, a house with the right trim.

next door

The darker colored house between the two light colored  houses may be 256, and the white one at the left is the house with the trim which matches my photo the house next door.

decatur1

In the photo above, you see the brown colored house has a wall similar to that which my subjects are standing near. It is four courses of blocks and a cap. I could not make out the trim on the cap no matter how much manipulation I did. I also saw no number painted or marked on the glass like that on my picture.  Also, the trees and cars are in the way, and the angles are not quite the same.  In spite of that, I believe this is the house that my Mother’s photo was taken in front of ca 1935-40.  I wish I had found this before Mom passed away, I know she could have identified the house.

decatur2

I have used Google Maps to look at aerial views of rural property, and even of my own house, but in those cases, I know what I am looking for, and can identify the property myself.

This experiment in looking for a house pictured in an old photo was very interesting, showing the power of scrolling up and down the street, searching for a certain feature.